Wednesday, May 09, 2007

Format snobbery

My friend Nicole recently lent me her copy of Mix Tape: The Art Of Cassette Culture, a collection of mixtape art, tracklists and musings edited by Thurston Moore. It’s an interesting read, not just for the insights into the record collections of people like Mike Watt and Jim O'Rourke, but because of the fascinating pretensions and ‘golden rules’ people have when they’re putting their tapes together. (Incidentally, one of the things that annoyed the shit out of me was the constant assertion that musical compilations are best enjoyed on two sides of magnetic tape. If you ask me, there’s ‘retro nostalgia’ and then there’s ‘so unwieldy that no one will listen to your tape more than twice’. But that’s irrelevant.)

When it comes to making mix tapes or CDs, I’ve always been a big fan of mood over crazed eclecticism or a stream of hits. One of my favourite tools is interval music; short, simple tunes that fit in between the other tracks to act like musical apple juice, cleansing the palate or creating a context for the following song.

I’ve linked four of my favourites here. The first, J Saunders’ Tinkle, I found on Four Tet’s Late Night Tales compilation. It’s an action-packed half-minute of pure library, a glockenspiel pattern which is interesting for its plainness and has resolved everything and clocked off in just over 30 seconds.

A Robin, by Aaron Martin, is a similar story. It’s an enchanting and sort of old-fashioned melody, and although it’s complicated, it sounds simple – 12 bars of an accordion melody, then looped, then with another accordion added, then cello and sound effects. The more you listen to it, the more it reveals its complexities, but it waits until you’re ready before surprising you and in the meantime it has a timelessness that keeps the flow of just about anything.

A little while back I bought a book of Tom Waits interviews, and one of the things that I found interesting was that he hates to listen to music in isolation or complete silence. He finds anything more interesting when it’s coming from down the hall or upstairs or with the sounds of the street blaring over the top. Need New Body’s Tuthmosis, from their last album, Where’s Black Ben, reminds me of that. Tuthmosis sounds like it’s not coming from your speakers but from a secret passageway in your house you never knew existed, and it has a sort of magic that makes anything that follows seem a bit special.


Then there’s Chick Corea’s The Law Of Falling And Catching Up, which is basically Stockhausen in two and a half minutes. It’s the sound of a jazz trio turning things down to the minimum, flipping the ratio of sounds to silence on its head. It’s almost completely silent, in fact, with only the occasional tap of the keys from Chick or a rattle of the snare from Roy Haynes to remind you they’re still there. It’s the mixtape space-in-between.

Actually, I haven’t finished Mix Tape yet so I’m jumping the gun a little, but it seems like a lot of the tapes that made the cut were genre-specific, and if not, long sides of strange and quirky selections. Am I just being a hopeless wanker with my "moods" and "interval music"?

13 WASSUP:

eliza said...

dear max,
i'm a maker of tapes.
and i mean tapes when i say tapes.
i think the assertion of mixes most enjoyed on magnetic tapes goes back to the care and effort involved in the making - on tape it has to happen in real time. also, you can include things like vinyl and other mix tapes with ease.
this is in opposition to the idea of every mix you make being the product of seven mins with an extensive itunes collection.
just a thought. or my thought.
the end.
x

max said...

well, i think the only think that guarantees care and effort in compilations is, um, care and effort. no offense, but i think any assertion that method or medium guarantee a superior result is plain snobbery.
true, you can easily record vinyl or tape to tape, but how much music these days do you have to rely on those formats for? i also think the practicality argument doesn't really stand up to the obvious practicality of cd.

eliza said...

hey grumpy pants,
maybe it is snobbery, but i know i prefer mixes on tape because its a guarantee someone hasn't just hit burn, which - when you don't know someone very well - is pretty high on the sweet heart meter. don't get me wrong, a mix of any kind received is a good thing, i'm just talking about what, to me, really hits the spot. and in the making of mixes I also prefer tape, because a) it forces you to see how well songs fit with each other and b) i, unfortunately, tend to engage with archaic formats in the making of mixes.
and i don't think there is a practicality argument to be made! i love that mix tapes dictate the need for me to listen to them in my room!
but this is just me. you're allowed to prefer whatever format you like.

richard said...

all this means is that im better at making mixtapes than youuuu!

maybe yr the format snob what with yr technology and yr ipod material boy in a material world!

max said...

yeah but that's clearly not the case.

richard said...

hmm. i kind of find yr opinions on mixtapes impossible. feel like i want to write a bit pro mixtape article
TAPE i mean. its going to tie in with an article about downloading too much music

max said...

why impossible? i just think it's silly to suggest that medium is the crucial factor when you're giving music to another person.

emmy hennings said...

I think that medium is crucial when it comes to mixes. I wrote an article about it once. It's over here

max said...

interesting. maybe i just don't get it, but i still don't understand why there's this perception that tapes have the monopoly on care and effort - i've spent loads of time myself writing out tracklists and cutting out artwork and shuffling through piles of albums.
i also don't really buy the argument that tapes are this low-budget link to the punk generation - tapes were still relatively new in the 70s, and i wonder how many punks had cassette recorders, and in any case, CDRs are as cheap as chips these days.
but as i said, maybe i just don't get it.

emmy hennings said...

Having recently made my first ever CD mix for someone I can appreciate better now that CD format takes care and effort, too. You're right Max to say that you still spend a lot of time sorting through albums. Especially if like me you haven't bothered uploading stuff to iTunes.

But I think the experience confirmed for me that the difference between tape and CD is tactility, and the fact that tape is in real time - all that forwarding and rewinding and having to listen to a song all the way through, sometimes several times over. And I just love the feel of a cassette tape in my hand - it fits the hand or the pocket so nicely.

Stevo Believo said...

Whether you agree or not - there are a lot of points and "rules" in the book that I don't agree on - it's an interesting read, and small insight into some people that fascinate me and what music makes them tick... Damon and Naomi, Richard Kern, Will Winant, Thurston himself, etc etc. And it's clear from the care put into the presentation that it's a subject he has a lot of love for.

Plus it looks rad on the bookshelf.

matt said...

i don't have a tape player anymore, so making mix tapes would just be anachronistic and sentimental. nice and cute, but kinda pointless.

Lawson said...

i don't think sentimental acts are pointless, in fact sentimentality often permeates that which we hold in any way special. anyway, apart from what all the other tape proponents have said, my reasons for preferring it over cd are more to do with how either one is received - the very fact it neccessitates the recipient seeking out the old equipment, sitting down and listening to each side in full means that the act of giving the music is more fully fleshed out, and means more than an easily playable/skippable cd. 'the medium is the message'. haha. not really relevant here but a bit of McLuhan is never a bad thing.